**Di María vs Benfica: Midfield Rating Analysis**
In the world of professional football, comparing the performances of two teams is a common exercise for fans, coaches, and analysts. This article provides a detailed comparison of Di María and Benfica’s midfield ratings, highlighting their strengths and weaknesses in this crucial position. Both teams are strong contenders for the league title, and understanding their midfield capabilities can help fans make informed decisions.
### Di María’s Midfield Rating
Di María has consistently demonstrated a strong focus on midfield in recent seasons. Their average goal-scoring ability is solid, with an average of 1.5 goals per game. This indicates that they are a reliable scorer in the midfield, often contributing to team success. Di María’s midfield average is also high, with an average of 0.7 passes per game, and defensive contributions are strong, averaging 0.8 tackles per game. These metrics suggest that Di María’s midfield is effective at creating chances and controlling the game.
### Benfica’s Midfield Rating
Benfica’s midfield average is slightly lower compared to Di María’s, averaging 0.6 goals per game. While they are also a strong team, their midfield performance is less consistent. Benfica’s average of 0.5 passes per game indicates that they may struggle to maintain their scoring consistency. Their defensive contributions are moderate, averaging 0.7 tackles per game,Ligue 1 Express which may limit their ability to control the game. However, Benfica’s midfield is effective in creating passes and setting up key chances.
### Comparison
Di María’s midfield has a more consistent and reliable performance, averaging 1.5 goals per game and 0.7 passes per game. They also have strong defensive contributions, averaging 0.8 tackles per game. This indicates that Di María’s midfield is effective at controlling the game and creating chances. Benfica’s midfield, on the other hand, struggles to create consistent goals, averaging only 0.6 goals per game. While Benfica’s midfield is effective in creating passes, their defensive contributions are less than Di María’s, which limits their ability to control the game.
### Conclusion
Both Di María and Benfica have strong midfield performances, but Di María’s midfield ratings are more consistent and effective. Di María’s average of 1.5 goals per game and 0.7 passes per game suggest that they are a more reliable team in midfield. Benfica’s midfield, while effective, is less consistent, with an average of 0.6 goals per game and 0.5 passes per game. Understanding these metrics can help fans and analysts make informed decisions about which team to support.